“I think a new football stadium will cause more problems than it solves,” Harlow told Charleston Daily Mail sports editor, Bill Smith. “I see the very likelihood of not being involved in the selection of a site. It will probably be done by the governor, the legislature and the Elks Lodge members.”
That last bit was a shot at Charleston businessman and Elks Club member Jim Nooney, who bitterly criticized WVU for not enthusiastically supporting the construction of a new football stadium.
“The people wanted a new stadium and they got it, but the only thing (they are) worried about is coming out of this looking bad because (they) asked for $10 million and got $20 million instead,” Nooney told AP sportswriter Alan Robinson.
“I just don’t understand it,” Nooney, who led a drive to get 10,000 signed petitions demanding a new football stadium be built, added. “The state legislature gives the university the chance to build something that’s been needed for years – a brand new football stadium that will enable us to compete favorably with other teams on our schedule – and (they act) like the university has been slighted.”
West Virginia University athletic director Leland Byrd countered Nooney’s criticism by stating that he thought the plan the University had presented the legislature was “more feasible.”
Harlow noted the $20 million allocation was not likely enough to fund a new football stadium, particularly at some of the potential sites under consideration.
The most logical place for the stadium, according to Harlow, was near the Mileground on a 300-acre patch of land the University owned. But undermining had made it cost-prohibitive to construct a football stadium in that location. Harlow also considered it to be the University’s most valuable piece of property, estimating its value at $1.5 million.
Cignetti said he was not a fan of the Mileground site because he wanted a place closer to the two campuses for the students.
“I was looking at it from the standpoint of, ‘Hey, we don’t need a third area in terms of a campus,’” he recalled.
Harlow mentioned that land near the WVU Coliseum wasn’t practical because of space limitations, and a large piece of property on Stewardstown Road, where the WVU Dairy Farm was located, also was not ideal.
The biggest issue with the University golf course location was its close proximity to the WVU Medical Center.
“We never considered a new stadium when we decided to ask the legislature to upgrade our stadium,” Harlow said at the time. “We believe it is more practical to renovate our current facility than it would be to construct a new stadium in a different part of town not easily accessible to the students, as Mountaineer Field is now.
“What we proposed was $10 million to add 10,000 new seats to Mountaineer Field. The new stadium would cost at least $20 million and would give us only 5,000 more seats than we would get with the renovations.”
Harlow, admitting he was surprised the legislature and state Board of Regents Chancellor Dr. Ben Morton were so agreeable to a new football stadium, continued, “There have been no feasibility studies made for the new stadium and no site selected. You just can’t drive a stake in the ground and say, ‘Let’s build our stadium here.’ You need time for studies and to work out the numerous problems that will arise with the undertaking of a major project.”
The outgoing president concluded, “I’ve felt disappointed that the legislature and Dr. Morton did not work closer with the university in deciding to go ahead with the new stadium. Dr. Morton never mentioned to me prior to legislative approval that he favored the new stadium project. He never asked my opinion.”
An astonishing admission, for sure. Harlow said there was no discussion of what to do with Mountaineer Field once it was abandoned. He estimated tearing it down would cost the University at least $2 million.