What Happens Next?
May 29, 2003 12:43 PM | General
By John
Antonik for MSNsportNET.com
May 29, 2003
MORGANTOWN, W.Va. – Well respected sports writer Mickey Furfari was having a friendly conversation with Penn State athletic director Jim Tarman after a West Virginia basketball game in State College, Pa., in 1989 when Tarman casually mentioned something that caught Furfari’s attention.
“This time next year we may be in the Big Ten,” Tarman whispered.
“Do you really think so?” answered Furfari.
“Maybe.”
Somewhat taken aback, Mickey decided to sit on Tarman’s bombshell and wait to see how things played out. “I missed the scoop of my life,” Furfari moaned. “Less than a year later Penn State announced it was joining the Big Ten Conference.”
Penn State had had enough of Eastern football.
Penn
State fails to form an Eastern all-sports conference
For more than
a decade, Penn State tried to convince its Eastern partners that an
all-sports alignment was in their best interests. The movement reached its
peak in 1982 after the Nittany Lions’ first national football championship.
Coach Joe Paterno, at the time also doubling as the school’s athletic
director, was the leading advocate for establishing an Eastern all-sports
league and he organized a meeting with football independent schools near
Philadelphia. According to Penn
State athletic official Frank Giardina in a recent written account for the
Charleston Daily Mail, the composition of the all-sports league was
to be made up of Penn State, Boston College, Pitt, Rutgers, Syracuse,
Temple, West Virginia and possibly the two service academies, Army and Navy.
At the time there was also some feeling that this conglomeration might have
been able to convince Maryland to jump from the ACC to the potential new
league. Many involved
in the negotiations thought the league was going to become a reality, but a
decisive stumbling block proved to be the percentage of revenue sharing. The
formula was said to be in the 16- to 17-percent range for bowl proceeds, but
Pitt, at the time a football power and regularly going to good bowl games,
balked at the revenue sharing plan and instead decided to join Syracuse and
Boston College in the Big East Conference and remain as a football
independent. An amusing
story making the rounds afterward in Pittsburgh was that late Panther
basketball coach Roy Chipman was not in favor of joining the all-sports
league because he saw membership in the Big East as a way to stick it to
West Virginia, Duquesne and Penn State. Whether or not
that story was true, there was a certain level of mistrust, jealousy and lack
of vision by some Eastern schools that led to the demise of Paterno’s
all-sports league concept. Sadly, that mistrust prevails today. Syracuse
athletic director Jake Crouthamel, in a written account published on
Syracuse’s official athletic web site, said Penn State initially asked to be
admitted into the eight-team Big East Conference but was turned down by a
vote of 5-3. Instead, the Big East schools decided to add Pitt as its ninth
member. In Crouthamel’s words, Pitt’s membership in the Big East combined
with Syracuse and Boston College “checkmated” Penn State’s Eastern sports
conference, and the all-conference movement was dead. Four years
prior to Paterno’s push for an all-sports league, the Big East Conference
came about because of newly imposed NCAA men’s basketball in-season
scheduling requirements. According to Crouthamel, athletic directors from
Providence, St. John’s, Georgetown and Syracuse got together to forge an
alliance for men’s basketball. The group, spearheaded by Providence athletic
director Dave Gavitt, then chose Boston College over Holy Cross, UMass and
Boston University for its fifth school. An invitation
was extended to Connecticut to make the league six teams. Rutgers was asked
to join but refused, instead deciding to stay in the Eastern 8 where it
wished to remain aligned with Penn State. That opened the way for Seton Hall
to join the Big East and become the seventh charter member. A year later
in 1980, Villanova left the Eastern 8 to join the Big East over Temple and
St. Joseph’s and Pitt was added to the mix for 1982-83 season. This alliance
proved particularly fruitful in men’s basketball with Georgetown, Syracuse
and St. John’s helping the Big East rise to national prominence. But the Big
East’s failure to adequately deal with the football issue proved to be a
haunting consequence that would have far-lasting implications for Eastern
athletics. Football was the Big East’s glass onion, with its many unpleasant
layers ready to be peeled off by its competitors. Even a
visionary like Dave Gavitt, who moved from Providence to become the league’s
first commissioner, couldn’t fully comprehend the role college football
would play in his intricately designed union of basketball schools.
Stuck in the middle
Although West
Virginia was not an original member of the Big East basketball conference,
decisions were being made by the league that directly impacted the school. Soon after it
was formed, the Big East snatched Eastern 8 member Villanova and then added
Pitt two years later. The Eastern 8
was an extension of the Eastern Collegiate Basketball League, formed in 1976
and included Duquesne, George Washington, Massachusetts, Penn State, Pitt,
Rutgers, Villanova and West Virginia. Revolving
membership was a primary characteristic of the league, which changed its
name to the Eastern 8 in 1978. St. Bonaventure replaced Penn State in 1978
and in 1981 Rhode Island took the place of Villanova. Finally in 1983 the
Eastern 8 became known as the Atlantic 10 when it added Temple, St. Joseph’s
and once again Penn State. The grouping
wasn’t ideal for West Virginia, by then a moderately sized public university
aligned with smaller private schools possessing limited athletic budgets.
But then again, any conference affiliation was better than nothing for the
geographically challenged Mountaineers. WVU’s first
major conference affiliation came in the late 1930s when it participated in
the Eastern Boxing League. West Virginia also played in a small form of an
Eastern Basketball League comprised of schools like Pitt, Fordham, Penn
State and Temple. That soon gave
way to independence. In the late
1940s, West Virginia athletic director Roy “Legs” Hawley was finding it
increasingly difficult to schedule football and basketball games. His
solution to the problem in 1950 was to enter the Southern Conference, a
17-team monstrosity that boasted a formidable lineup of schools that
included Clemson, Duke, Maryland, North Carolina, North Carolina State,
South Carolina, Virginia Tech and Wake Forest. No sooner did
West Virginia get settled into the Southern Conference when the North
Carolina schools broke off to form the Atlantic Coast Conference on May 8,
1953, at the Sedgefield Inn near Greensboro, N.C. Duke, North
Carolina, North Carolina State and Wake Forest joined forces with Clemson,
Maryland and South Carolina to establish a seven-team conference. Six months
later in December, 1953, Virginia became the ACC’s eighth school. According to
Mickey Furfari, West Virginia had its sights set on being that eighth
school. “West Virginia
was hoping Maryland would sponsor them for ACC membership but they didn’t,”
Furfari recalled. “The motion came up quickly and South Carolina voted in
favor but the North Carolina schools didn’t vote for West Virginia.” Their primary
reason was West Virginia’s inaccessibility. There were no major interstate
highways leading into Morgantown, W.Va., and the city’s small airport
couldn’t handle large aircraft.
“Driving to
Richmond back then took an entire day,” Furfari said. Any hopes West
Virginia had of escaping a watered-down Southern Conference were dashed when
Duke visited Morgantown for the school’s holiday basketball classic in 1963.
The team endured a difficult charter flight to Morgantown on an old DC-10
that left all of them sick. Smith Barrier,
a nationally known sports writer and a close friend of West Virginia
University athletic director Red Brown, later told Furfari that he overhead
Duke coach Vic Bubas on the flight say he would never again come to
Morgantown to play a basketball game. West Virginia
remained in the Southern Conference until the end of the 1968 season when
football coach Jim Carlen convinced Brown to leave the league and become an
independent in football. “Carlen pulled
West Virginia out of the Southern Conference and then a year later he left
for Texas Tech,” said Furfari. The decision
to leave the Southern Conference helped remove the shackles from the
football program but it put an extraordinary burden on West Virginia’s other
sports. WVU’s first basketball season outside the Southern Conference saw
the Mountaineers play games against UCLA, Santa Clara, Arizona, St. John’s,
Maryland, Duke, Syracuse and Florida. Not surprisingly, West Virginia posted
a losing 12-14 record. By the mid 1970s it was
apparent that West Virginia once again needed a conference affiliation for
scheduling and joined the ECBL. In the mid
1980s West Virginia was approached by the Metro Conference to join the
league for basketball. Athletic director Fred Schaus resisted the temptation
to move his team out of the Northeast. “The media and
a good number of West Virginia fans were for going,” Furfari said. “Metro
Conference representatives even made a visit to the West Virginia University
campus.” Once again in
1990 West Virginia was courted by the Metro in a plan that included a
16-team super conference made up of existing Metro schools and Eastern
independents. Raycom, Inc., under the direction of Metro commissioner Ralph
McFillen, presented a plan that would join West Virginia, Pitt, Boston
College, East Carolina, Syracuse with Cincinnati, Florida State, Louisville,
Memphis, South Carolina, Southern Mississippi, Tulane and Virginia Tech. Movement
toward establishing an Eastern football conference was gaining momentum.
Big
East Football Conference created
In 1990, the
Big East Conference’s football problem fell directly into the lap of new Big
East commissioner Michael Tranghese, who was on the job for a few weeks when
Penn State made the announcement that it was joining the Big Ten. In August, the
SEC plucked Arkansas from the Southwest Conference and added South Carolina
a month later to form a 12-team super conference. Realizing the
role football played in college athletics and understanding that Syracuse,
Boston College and Pitt were dangerously exposed, Tranghese brokered a deal
to take Miami off the market and added the Hurricanes as the Big East’s 10th
member in 1990. This
ultimately led to the Big East’s football-only federation that included West
Virginia, Virginia Tech, Rutgers and Temple. It became known as the Big East
Football Conference on Feb. 5, 1991. Although the
relationship was for football only, it was becoming apparent by the
mid-1990s that this union wasn’t going to hold. In essence there were two
separate leagues operating under the same roof: the Big East Football
Conference and the Big East Conference. Having a
proactive agenda in a conference made up of dissimilar football and
basketball schools is akin to former senator Alexander Wiley’s
characterization of the U.S. Congress: someone gets up and says nothing, no
one pays attention, and then everyone disagrees. The football
issue forced the Big East to reconsider the status of West Virginia and
Rutgers and after considerable debate by the league’s basketball schools,
both were added as full-fledged members. In addition, Notre Dame was also
included for all sports except football for the start of the 1995-96
academic year. Temple and
Virginia Tech were left out in the cold. This
compromise kept things in check until 1999 when the status of Virginia Tech
once again forced another deciding moment for the league. Reopening the same
wounds, the 13 Big East schools wrestled with the notion of adding another
team to its all-sports league to further complicate its basketball
composition – particularly its postseason tournament setup at Madison Square
Garden. The ultimate
solution was to admit Virginia Tech in all sports, facilitate Connecticut’s
move from Division I-AA football to Division I status, and later exercise an
attendance clause that would ultimately force Temple out of the league. The beach ball
was being pushed farther down into the water and the time was rapidly
approaching when that ball was going to fly right back up into their faces.
Tech’s trepidation
Virginia Tech
was happy to be joining the Big East conference, but the school delayed its
entry into the league by two seasons until the 2001-02 academic year. The
reason was simple: Virginia Tech athletic director Jim Weaver was worried
that either the ACC or the SEC might present a compelling case to Miami and
convince the Hurricanes to leave the Big East. Although Miami
was coming off an NCAA probation period that saw its record drop to 5-6 in
1997 and improve somewhat a year later in 1998, the Hurricanes were still a
very appealing entity. By contrast,
Big East football in 1998 was not very appealing. Syracuse
captured the conference title with an 8-3 record and was beaten soundly by
Florida in the Orange Bowl as part of the recently formed and controversial
Bowl Championship Series (BCS). Worried about the prospects of a watered
down television deal and the danger of losing its BCS status, Tranghese
initiated a secret meeting with the Atlantic Coast Conference in an attempt
to protect his league’s flank. Some of the
details of this meeting were revealed earlier this month by Citadel athletic
director Les Robinson, who at the time was the athletic director at North
Carolina State. Rehashed in the May 24 edition of the Ft. Lauderdale
Sun-Sentinel, the apparent reason Tranghese set up the meeting at
Atlanta’s Hartsfield International Airport in 1998 was to gauge the ACC’s
interest in a football-only merger. At the time, Tranghese was fearful of
another attempt by the Big Ten to expand to 12 teams and take either Pitt,
Rutgers or Notre Dame. Those in the
meeting included Robinson, Tranghese, Florida State athletic director Dave
Hart, ACC commissioner John Swofford, Miami athletic director Paul Dee and
Syracuse athletic director Jake Crouthamel. “Miami had
some interest and Syracuse was listening intently,” Robinson was quoted in
the Sun-Sentinel. As it turned
out, Jim Weaver had every reason to be concerned about the status of the Big
East.
ACC’s courtship of Miami
Just how many
presentations the Atlantic Coast Conference has made to Miami is unknown,
but Michael Tranghese said at the Big East meetings in Ponte Vedra Beach,
Fla., that there have been several. In 1999 news
began leaking out of the ACC football meetings that the conference was
considering the issue of expansion. Only twice since 1953 has the league
added teams. In 1979 Georgia Tech was added to the fold and in 1991 Florida
State became the ACC’s ninth team. “This
conference has been and continues to be very deliberate in regard to the
expansion issue,” said Swofford at the time. “There’s a process that is
there. We have not reached a formal stage at this point, and I don’t know if
we will.” In simpler
terms, Swofford didn’t have the necessary seven out of nine league votes for
expansion. Reasons for concern about ACC expansion include losing complete
home-and-home schedules for basketball, football teams not playing every
other league member annually, dealing with decreased ticket allotments per
school for the ACC men’s basketball tournament, and increased travel for
non-revenue teams. More
importantly, Duke basketball coach Mike Krzyzewski was publicly opposed to
the ACC doing anything to disrupt its basketball league. Schools in
favor of expansion had its biggest stake in the football conference: Florida
State, Georgia Tech and Clemson. ACC basketball
won out in 1999, but the football schools remained persistent. Additional
financial studies were conducted. Swofford said
ominously in 1999: “What’s important from our standpoint is that we be
proactive in our thinking,” he told the St. Petersburg Times. “What I mean
by proactive is talking about our future and whether we’re better off at
nine, or for the future, we’re better off with an additional team or more,
as well as discussing what’s going on around us or what potentially may go
on around us in other leagues.” The ACC
blueprint for future expansion was established. Big
East thrives
The Big East
survived the ACC’s half-hearted attempt at a hostile takeover in 1999 and
the conference once again thrived. Connecticut won the men’s basketball
national championship and Connecticut women’s basketball replaced Tennessee
as the sport’s marquee program. Notre Dame produced its first national title
in women’s basketball in 2001 to compliment UConn’s four NCAA titles from
1995-2003. This spring, Syracuse captured its first-ever men's basketball championship. Virginia Tech,
behind the brilliant play of quarterback Michael Vick, was one quarter away
from winning its first national championship in football in 1999.
Miami had
restocked its roster after NCAA probation and reached No. 2 in the national
polls in 2000, narrowly missing out on a spot in the national championship
game against Big 12 winner Oklahoma. A year later
in 2001 Miami ran the table and won its second national championship as a
representative of the Big East Conference. Last fall, an official’s call
kept the Hurricanes from becoming college football’s first repeat champion
since Nebraska did it in 1994-95. For four
straight years, the Big East Conference had either the nation’s No. 1 or No.
2-ranked football team. The last two seasons, half of its football members
finished ranked in the Top 25. And while Miami has always been considered
the crown jewel of the football conference, no Big East team has done more
over the last 10 years than Virginia Tech. Since 1993,
the Hokies have finished ranked in the Top 25 nine times including Top 10
finishes in 1995, 1999 and 2000. “We’ve been at
this for 24 years and we’ve been at it in football for 13 years,” said
Tranghese. “We think what we’ve done is a pretty impressive accomplishment.
As always we think we’ve been prepared to stand up and compete with
anybody.” The same
couldn’t be said for the Big East’s southern neighbors in the Atlantic Coast
Conference. Since the ACC began discussing the addition of Miami in 1999,
ACC football has fallen on hard times. The league’s cornerstone team,
Florida State, slid to fifth in the national ratings in 2000 and all the way
down to 15th in 2001. Hampered by
several off-field incidents and disturbing accusations that former
quarterback Adrian McPherson may have bet on football games, Florida State
fell to 23rd in the national rankings last season despite winning
the ACC title and representing the conference in the Bowl Championship
Series. The wolves are
beginning to circle around 73-year-old Seminole coach Bobby Bowden in
Tallahassee. Problems are also brewing in Atlanta, where Georgia Tech this
spring was forced to suspend 10 football players and a men’s tennis player
for academic shortcomings just two years after Yellow Jackets football coach
George O’Leary was caught lying on his resume. The last time
two ACC football teams finished ranked in the Top 10 was in 1998 when
Florida State was third and Georgia Tech was ninth. Last year the ACC came
dangerously close to having the embarrassing “Big East clause” enacted,
meaning its conference champion almost wasn’t ranked high enough to qualify
for a BCS game. Swofford was
ready to pull the master plan off the shelf.
Tranghese sounds off
The Big East
went into crisis mode in mid-April when Commissioner Michael Tranghese told
trusted friend Dick Weiss of the New York Daily News that the ACC was
planning once again to try and lure Miami away from the Big East. However this
time, the ACC was prepared to include two other teams (Syracuse and Boston
College) along with Miami to make a 12-team super conference on par with the
SEC and Big 12. “They’re
trying to divide and conquer,” said Tranghese. Several news
stories followed as events began to pick up steam. Swofford wanted to stage
his raid by stealth, ironing out all of the details with his member schools
in private before officially inviting the three new members into the league. But Tranghese
turned on the light and brought the ACC’s plans out into the open. “It’s
unfortunate,” was Swofford’s reply to Tranghese’s outburst. Operating
under a rapidly closing window of opportunity, Swofford was able to put
together a convincing presentation to conference athletic directors and head
coaches. His plea was so persuasive that Mike Krzyzewski, once strongly
opposed to expansion, stepped aside. The dominoes immediately began to fall. The league got
the necessary votes for expansion in a straw poll. The only hurdle left was
whether or not to add Virginia Tech into the mix. Besides Virginia, which
was receiving local political pressure to include Virginia Tech, there was
little support from the rest of the ACC for the Hokies. The league picked
Miami, Boston College and Syracuse as its three targets for expansion. The
ACC believes that Syracuse will deliver the lucrative New York City
television market and BC will cover the Boston market. Former
commissioner Roy Kramer, the architect of the Southeastern Conference’s
successful 1990 acquisition of Arkansas and South Carolina, scratched his
head when he was asked to explain the ACC’s attempt to gut the Big East. “One of the
things we looked at was homogenous institutions,” Kramer told ESPN.com’s
Ivan Maisel. “We wanted schools with a strong fan base that traveled well.
TV wasn’t a dominating factor. Our people were interested in fan base and a
broad-based program. I don’t know what the ACC is looking for. I suspect
that they are looking for TV markets and a football image.” If expansion
moves forward, the ACC will have a tough time cracking the Boston market.
Once ACC expansion news made its way off the Internet chat boards into more
solid mediums, the Boston Globe chose to run the story on the back
pages of its sports section. Even now in its advanced stages, ACC expansion
has yet to become a page one story in the Globe. Syracuse may
be located in New York, but gaining the valuable New York City market is an
even bigger stretch. New York City is not a big college football town and
the two biggest football attractions are Penn State and Notre Dame – not
Syracuse. As for ACC
basketball in New York City, forget about it. “If you think people in New
York City are going to come see Clemson play Boston College in Madison
Square Garden you’re mistaken,” Tranghese said. According to
published reports, Miami’s interest in the ACC is primarily financial. The
school admitted losing more than $1.4 million two years ago despite
winning the national football championship. The Atlantic Coast Conference’s
revenue sharing model netted member schools more than $9 million each last
year. One Big East
athletic official compared the ACC’s revenue sharing plan to that of
socialism, while the Big East is more like capitalism: win and you get more
of the pie. The ACC says a
conference football championship game would give the league an additional
$30 million, which would more than make up for the addition of three new
teams. The Big East contends the ACC’s financial figures are cooked and the
next television contract will be significantly less than what the ACC has
promised Miami, Syracuse and BC. Despite being
two of the original seven Big East schools, Syracuse and Boston College are
said to be interested in the move because in the words of Jake Crouthamel, a
Big East football conference without Miami is not “viable.” As strange as
it sounds, Crouthamel says his school is prepared to travel long distances
to play an all-sports ACC schedule just to stay aligned with Miami. Boston
College says it is prepared to do the same. If Miami,
Boston College and Syracuse leave the Big East, the conference will have
just Pitt, West Virginia, Virginia Tech, Rutgers and Connecticut left as
football playing schools. More teams would have to be added to keep the Big
East in business. Notre Dame has
been quiet throughout the entire process and it's unclear what the school's intentions are. The Irish have experienced a resurgence in their Olympic sports and will try to protect them. However, it is unlikely Notre Dame
will offer its football program to the Big East. The fate of
the Big East Conference as we know it now rests on the shoulders of Miami
president Donna Shalala, once a member of the Bill Clinton administration.
Recently Shalala made a pledge of allegiance to league presidents,
saying she was perfectly content with her school’s affiliation with the Big
East Conference. Obviously
something has changed since then. Meanwhile, old
Joe Paterno is sitting up in State College, Pa., glad his hands are clean of
this mess.
John Antonik can be reached at
John.Antonik@mail.wvu.edu

Penn State coach Joe Paterno tried for
years to organize an Eastern all-sports conference (AP photo).

Football coach Jim Carlen convinced West Virginia to leave the Southern Conference in 1968 (WVU Sports Communications).
"Having a proactive agenda in a
conference made up of dissimilar football and basketball schools is
akin to former senator Alexander Wiley’s characterization of the U.S.
Congress: someone gets up and says nothing, no one pays attention, and
then everyone disagrees."

Big East commissioner Michael Tranghese
has presided over a football conference that has had either the nation's
No. 1 or No. 2 ranked team in each of the last four years (Big East
photo).

Miami president Donna Shalala's decision
will determine the future makeup of the Big East Conference (AP photo).












